Hi Mike,
thanks for pointing this out: it is an ommission - halt is a reserved
keyword and there should also a HaltStatement being defined.
Best regards,
Ina
>
Original Message
> From: active_ttcn3 : mts stf133 ttcn version 3 - active
> members only [This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.] On Behalf Of Michael Sperber
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 1:12 PM
> To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
> Subject: Grammar rule for halt statement
>
> I've noticed that the halt statement isn't part of the grammar in the
> 3.3.7 draft. ("halt" is also missing from the list of
> reserved words in
> Table A.3.) Am I misunderstanding the syntax, or is this an omission?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Mike
>
